Cement Giants Ultratech, Dalmia Bharat Under CCI Lens For Cartelisation
Share this article:
India's cement industry is once again under the regulatory spotlight, as the Competition Commission of India (CCI) deepens its investigation into potential cartelisation practices. Major players including Aditya Birla Group’s UltraTech Cement—now the promoter of India Cements—Dalmia Bharat Cements, and Shree Digvijay Cements, along with their key executives, have been asked to submit detailed financial records. This follows a complaint by ONGC regarding suspected collusion in cement tenders.
Key Allegations and CCI Demands
According to CCI's findings, these companies allegedly coordinated via a middleman to manipulate pricing and tender outcomes. As part of the investigation:
This development follows UltraTech’s acquisition of a controlling stake in India Cements, further strengthening its dominance in the sector.
CCI’s Past Landmark Rulings on Unfair Practices
The CCI has a robust track record of clamping down on unethical practices. Here are some notable past actions that shaped India’s corporate regulatory landscape:
1. Cement Cartel Case (2012 & 2016)
CCI imposed over ₹6,300 crore in penalties on 11 cement companies, including ACC, UltraTech, Ambuja, and India Cements, for price fixing and limiting production. These firms were found guilty of using their trade body to rig prices, distorting the market.
2. Google Android Case (2022)
Google was fined ₹1,337.73 crore for abusing its dominant position in the Android ecosystem. The tech giant had imposed unfair restrictions on device makers. As a result, CCI’s order compelled Google to amend its business practices, boosting digital competition.
3. Indian Railways Bid Rigging (2022)
Seven companies were penalised for collusion in tenders for protective tubes supplied to Indian Railways. The companies rigged bids and manipulated pricing. Notably, whistleblowers were granted leniency under CCI’s lesser penalty programme.
Why Fair Competition Matters
For a diverse and fast-growing economy like India, ethical business practices are vital. Unfair conduct such as cartelisation and bid rigging has deep consequences:
CCI’s Commitment to Transparency
The current cement cartelisation probe reflects the CCI’s dedication to ensuring fair play in Indian markets. With firm demands for transparency and strong penalties for non-compliance, the regulator is reinforcing a culture of ethical corporate behaviour. Its consistent actions send a strong message — unethical practices will not be tolerated, and healthy competition is the foundation of sustainable economic growth.
Key Allegations and CCI Demands
According to CCI's findings, these companies allegedly coordinated via a middleman to manipulate pricing and tender outcomes. As part of the investigation:
- UltraTech and India Cements have been instructed to submit their financial statements from FY2015 to FY2019.
- Dalmia Bharat and Shree Digvijay Cements must provide audited financials from FY2011 to FY2019.
- Company Executives are required to furnish income tax records and detailed financial data for five years, along with formal responses to the allegations.
- All companies must also disclose income generated from transactions linked to the suspected anti-competitive practices.
- A compliance warning has been issued: failure to provide complete and accurate information will lead to penalties under Section 45 of the Competition Act.
This development follows UltraTech’s acquisition of a controlling stake in India Cements, further strengthening its dominance in the sector.
CCI’s Past Landmark Rulings on Unfair Practices
The CCI has a robust track record of clamping down on unethical practices. Here are some notable past actions that shaped India’s corporate regulatory landscape:
1. Cement Cartel Case (2012 & 2016)
CCI imposed over ₹6,300 crore in penalties on 11 cement companies, including ACC, UltraTech, Ambuja, and India Cements, for price fixing and limiting production. These firms were found guilty of using their trade body to rig prices, distorting the market.
2. Google Android Case (2022)
Google was fined ₹1,337.73 crore for abusing its dominant position in the Android ecosystem. The tech giant had imposed unfair restrictions on device makers. As a result, CCI’s order compelled Google to amend its business practices, boosting digital competition.
3. Indian Railways Bid Rigging (2022)
Seven companies were penalised for collusion in tenders for protective tubes supplied to Indian Railways. The companies rigged bids and manipulated pricing. Notably, whistleblowers were granted leniency under CCI’s lesser penalty programme.
Why Fair Competition Matters
For a diverse and fast-growing economy like India, ethical business practices are vital. Unfair conduct such as cartelisation and bid rigging has deep consequences:
- Harms Consumers: Artificially high prices limit choice and hurt the end-user.
- Blocks Innovation: Dominant companies prevent new players from entering the market.
- Destroys Trust: Repeated misconduct shakes investor confidence and market credibility.
CCI’s Commitment to Transparency
The current cement cartelisation probe reflects the CCI’s dedication to ensuring fair play in Indian markets. With firm demands for transparency and strong penalties for non-compliance, the regulator is reinforcing a culture of ethical corporate behaviour. Its consistent actions send a strong message — unethical practices will not be tolerated, and healthy competition is the foundation of sustainable economic growth.
Next Story