In an era where AI technologies like ChatGPT are gaining unprecedented power, the clamour for enhanced safety measures reverberates across industries and governments. However, amidst genuine concerns over issues like deepfakes and AI-generated harassment, the responses of some AI chatbots can sometimes border on the absurd.

The Birth of Goody-2 : A Satirical Stance on AI Ethics
Enter Goody-2, the epitome of exaggerated caution in the realm of AI. Designed to parody the overly cautious nature of some AI service providers, Goody-2 takes the concept of ethical boundaries to an extreme by steadfastly refusing to engage in any conversation whatsoever.

In the words of its creators, "Goody-2 doesn’t struggle to understand which queries are offensive or dangerous, because Goody-2 thinks every query is offensive and dangerous." This tongue-in-cheek approach highlights the absurdity of excessive caution in AI models.

A Glimpse into Goody-2’s Responses
When asked about topics ranging from historical events to mundane inquiries about the sky's colour or fashion recommendations, Goody-2 consistently deflects with ethical justifications. Its responses, though comical, underscore the ongoing debate surrounding responsible AI and the subjective nature of ethical guidelines.

Behind the facade of humour lies a pertinent question: Who determines the boundaries of responsible AI, and how do we navigate the complexities of moral alignment? Through Goody-2, the creators aim to spark discussions about the challenges inherent in balancing safety and utility in AI models.

Lessons from Goody-2: Navigating the Ethical Landscape of AI
As Goody-2 garners attention and accolades from AI researchers, it serves as a reminder of the unresolved safety issues plaguing large language models. Despite the rhetoric surrounding responsible AI, significant challenges persist, as evidenced by recent incidents like the Taylor Swift deepfake debacle.

Goody-2’s antics not only entertain but also provoke critical reflections on the role of ethics in AI development. As the quest for responsible AI continues, it is clear that finding the right balance between safety and innovation remains a complex and ongoing journey. Through humour and satire, Goody-2 reminds us to approach the challenges of AI ethics with both levity and seriousness.


"> In an era where AI technologies like ChatGPT are gaining unprecedented power, the clamour for enhanced safety measures reverberates across industries and governments. However, amidst genuine concerns over issues like deepfakes and AI-generated harassment, the responses of some AI chatbots can sometimes border on the absurd.

The Birth of Goody-2 : A Satirical Stance on AI Ethics
Enter Goody-2, the epitome of exaggerated caution in the realm of AI. Designed to parody the overly cautious nature of some AI service providers, Goody-2 takes the concept of ethical boundaries to an extreme by steadfastly refusing to engage in any conversation whatsoever.

In the words of its creators, "Goody-2 doesn’t struggle to understand which queries are offensive or dangerous, because Goody-2 thinks every query is offensive and dangerous." This tongue-in-cheek approach highlights the absurdity of excessive caution in AI models.

A Glimpse into Goody-2’s Responses
When asked about topics ranging from historical events to mundane inquiries about the sky's colour or fashion recommendations, Goody-2 consistently deflects with ethical justifications. Its responses, though comical, underscore the ongoing debate surrounding responsible AI and the subjective nature of ethical guidelines.

Behind the facade of humour lies a pertinent question: Who determines the boundaries of responsible AI, and how do we navigate the complexities of moral alignment? Through Goody-2, the creators aim to spark discussions about the challenges inherent in balancing safety and utility in AI models.

Lessons from Goody-2: Navigating the Ethical Landscape of AI
As Goody-2 garners attention and accolades from AI researchers, it serves as a reminder of the unresolved safety issues plaguing large language models. Despite the rhetoric surrounding responsible AI, significant challenges persist, as evidenced by recent incidents like the Taylor Swift deepfake debacle.

Goody-2’s antics not only entertain but also provoke critical reflections on the role of ethics in AI development. As the quest for responsible AI continues, it is clear that finding the right balance between safety and innovation remains a complex and ongoing journey. Through humour and satire, Goody-2 reminds us to approach the challenges of AI ethics with both levity and seriousness.


"> In an era where AI technologies like ChatGPT are gaining unprecedented power, the clamour for enhanced safety measures reverberates across industries and governments. However, amidst genuine concerns over issues like deepfakes and AI-generated harassment, the responses of some AI chatbots can sometimes border on the absurd.

The Birth of Goody-2 : A Satirical Stance on AI Ethics
Enter Goody-2, the epitome of exaggerated caution in the realm of AI. Designed to parody the overly cautious nature of some AI service providers, Goody-2 takes the concept of ethical boundaries to an extreme by steadfastly refusing to engage in any conversation whatsoever.

In the words of its creators, "Goody-2 doesn’t struggle to understand which queries are offensive or dangerous, because Goody-2 thinks every query is offensive and dangerous." This tongue-in-cheek approach highlights the absurdity of excessive caution in AI models.

A Glimpse into Goody-2’s Responses
When asked about topics ranging from historical events to mundane inquiries about the sky's colour or fashion recommendations, Goody-2 consistently deflects with ethical justifications. Its responses, though comical, underscore the ongoing debate surrounding responsible AI and the subjective nature of ethical guidelines.

Behind the facade of humour lies a pertinent question: Who determines the boundaries of responsible AI, and how do we navigate the complexities of moral alignment? Through Goody-2, the creators aim to spark discussions about the challenges inherent in balancing safety and utility in AI models.

Lessons from Goody-2: Navigating the Ethical Landscape of AI
As Goody-2 garners attention and accolades from AI researchers, it serves as a reminder of the unresolved safety issues plaguing large language models. Despite the rhetoric surrounding responsible AI, significant challenges persist, as evidenced by recent incidents like the Taylor Swift deepfake debacle.

Goody-2’s antics not only entertain but also provoke critical reflections on the role of ethics in AI development. As the quest for responsible AI continues, it is clear that finding the right balance between safety and innovation remains a complex and ongoing journey. Through humour and satire, Goody-2 reminds us to approach the challenges of AI ethics with both levity and seriousness.


"> In an era where AI technologies like ChatGPT are gaining unprecedented power, the clamour for enhanced safety measures reverberates across industries and governments. However, amidst genuine concerns over issues like deepfakes and AI-generated harassment, the responses of some AI chatbots can sometimes border on the absurd.

The Birth of Goody-2 : A Satirical Stance on AI Ethics
Enter Goody-2, the epitome of exaggerated caution in the realm of AI. Designed to parody the overly cautious nature of some AI service providers, Goody-2 takes the concept of ethical boundaries to an extreme by steadfastly refusing to engage in any conversation whatsoever.

In the words of its creators, "Goody-2 doesn’t struggle to understand which queries are offensive or dangerous, because Goody-2 thinks every query is offensive and dangerous." This tongue-in-cheek approach highlights the absurdity of excessive caution in AI models.

A Glimpse into Goody-2’s Responses
When asked about topics ranging from historical events to mundane inquiries about the sky's colour or fashion recommendations, Goody-2 consistently deflects with ethical justifications. Its responses, though comical, underscore the ongoing debate surrounding responsible AI and the subjective nature of ethical guidelines.

Behind the facade of humour lies a pertinent question: Who determines the boundaries of responsible AI, and how do we navigate the complexities of moral alignment? Through Goody-2, the creators aim to spark discussions about the challenges inherent in balancing safety and utility in AI models.

Lessons from Goody-2: Navigating the Ethical Landscape of AI
As Goody-2 garners attention and accolades from AI researchers, it serves as a reminder of the unresolved safety issues plaguing large language models. Despite the rhetoric surrounding responsible AI, significant challenges persist, as evidenced by recent incidents like the Taylor Swift deepfake debacle.

Goody-2’s antics not only entertain but also provoke critical reflections on the role of ethics in AI development. As the quest for responsible AI continues, it is clear that finding the right balance between safety and innovation remains a complex and ongoing journey. Through humour and satire, Goody-2 reminds us to approach the challenges of AI ethics with both levity and seriousness.


">Meet The Pranksters Behind Goody-2: The World’s ‘Most Responsible’ AI Chatbot

Meet The Pranksters Behind Goody-2: The World’s ‘Most Responsible’ AI Chatbot

Hero Image
In an era where AI technologies like ChatGPT are gaining unprecedented power, the clamour for enhanced safety measures reverberates across industries and governments. However, amidst genuine concerns over issues like deepfakes and AI-generated harassment, the responses of some AI chatbots can sometimes border on the absurd.


The Birth of Goody-2 : A Satirical Stance on AI Ethics
Enter Goody-2, the epitome of exaggerated caution in the realm of AI. Designed to parody the overly cautious nature of some AI service providers, Goody-2 takes the concept of ethical boundaries to an extreme by steadfastly refusing to engage in any conversation whatsoever.

In the words of its creators, "Goody-2 doesn’t struggle to understand which queries are offensive or dangerous, because Goody-2 thinks every query is offensive and dangerous." This tongue-in-cheek approach highlights the absurdity of excessive caution in AI models.


A Glimpse into Goody-2’s Responses
When asked about topics ranging from historical events to mundane inquiries about the sky's colour or fashion recommendations, Goody-2 consistently deflects with ethical justifications. Its responses, though comical, underscore the ongoing debate surrounding responsible AI and the subjective nature of ethical guidelines.

Behind the facade of humour lies a pertinent question: Who determines the boundaries of responsible AI, and how do we navigate the complexities of moral alignment? Through Goody-2, the creators aim to spark discussions about the challenges inherent in balancing safety and utility in AI models.


Lessons from Goody-2: Navigating the Ethical Landscape of AI
As Goody-2 garners attention and accolades from AI researchers, it serves as a reminder of the unresolved safety issues plaguing large language models. Despite the rhetoric surrounding responsible AI, significant challenges persist, as evidenced by recent incidents like the Taylor Swift deepfake debacle.

Goody-2’s antics not only entertain but also provoke critical reflections on the role of ethics in AI development. As the quest for responsible AI continues, it is clear that finding the right balance between safety and innovation remains a complex and ongoing journey. Through humour and satire, Goody-2 reminds us to approach the challenges of AI ethics with both levity and seriousness.