From passion to paycheck: How soaring debt is changing the way students choose majors in US
America’s higher education system is standing at a breaking point. Outstanding student loan debt has ballooned to $1.81 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve, marking one of the most crippling financial burdens in the nation’s history. For millions of Americans, the dream of higher education, once synonymous with upward mobility, has become an anchor of lifelong debt.
Compounding the crisis is President Donald Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” a sweeping policy overhaul that has reshaped how students pay for college. The act has curtailed grant eligibility for low-income students and imposed strict borrowing caps, pushing many families to the edge of affordability. As a result, the pursuit of higher learning increasingly resembles a luxury, one accessible only to those with means, foresight, or luck.
A calculated pursuit: The new economics of college choice
Today’s students are not just choosing majors; they’re making strategic investments. With borrowing limits tightened and tuition rates soaring, many young Americans are turning to data to predict which degrees will deliver the greatest financial return.
According to US News & World Report, citing PayScale’s 2024 data, the ten highest-paying majors are dominated by STEM disciplines, with computer engineering and computer science leading the pack. Graduates in these fields are commanding six-figure salaries just years after entering the workforce, a reflection of both technological demand and economic pragmatism.
But this reliance on STEM as the golden ticket to success has sparked fierce debate. Are there truly not enough American engineers and scientists to meet industry needs? Or is the shortage narrative merely a myth used to justify policy changes and immigration reforms?
The STEM shortage debate
The National Science Board’s March 2024 report offered a candid assessment of the country’s technological dependency. Conservative voices offer a starkly different perspective. The Center for Immigration Studies, in an August 2024 report, dismissed the idea of a STEM worker shortage, citing wage stagnation and surging degree completions as signs that the labor pool is already saturated.
The divide highlights a broader tension in the national dialogue: Whether America’s education crisis stems from a lack of skills or a lack of equitable opportunity.
When majors become market strategies
In an environment defined by financial pressure, students are turning their majors into market bets. PayScale’s 2021–22 College Salary Report, which analyzed data from 3.5 million graduates, ranked the degrees that yield the highest returns. The findings confirmed that engineering, computer science, and quantitative disciplines remain the most lucrative.
Top-performing fields according to Payscale's College Salary Report:
Interestingly, non-STEM majors such as political economy and pharmacy also made the list, showing that intellectual disciplines rooted in policy and medicine still hold economic weight.
The cost of exclusion
For low-income and first-generation students, however, this shift toward profit-driven degrees may feel like an exclusionary game. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act , by slashing need-based grants, has made it harder for these students to pursue high-return majors that often require access to elite institutions and expensive preparatory programs.
The language of return
Once upon a time, college was spoken of in moral and intellectual terms, a place to discover purpose, expand knowledge, and challenge norms. But the lexicon has changed. In today’s America, education is increasingly described in the language of markets and returns.
Still, beneath the cynicism, a quiet resistance is growing. Many students are blending practicality with purpose, merging technology with the arts, business with social sciences, or design with data analytics. Their approach reflects a more nuanced understanding: That economic survival and intellectual fulfillment need not be mutually exclusive.
This generation’s recalibration of ambition may well redefine what higher education means in America. In a system skewed toward privilege and profit, their choices signal a deeper awakening, one that values adaptability, interdisciplinary thought, and the pursuit of knowledge as both a livelihood and a legacy.
Compounding the crisis is President Donald Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” a sweeping policy overhaul that has reshaped how students pay for college. The act has curtailed grant eligibility for low-income students and imposed strict borrowing caps, pushing many families to the edge of affordability. As a result, the pursuit of higher learning increasingly resembles a luxury, one accessible only to those with means, foresight, or luck.
A calculated pursuit: The new economics of college choice
Today’s students are not just choosing majors; they’re making strategic investments. With borrowing limits tightened and tuition rates soaring, many young Americans are turning to data to predict which degrees will deliver the greatest financial return.
According to US News & World Report, citing PayScale’s 2024 data, the ten highest-paying majors are dominated by STEM disciplines, with computer engineering and computer science leading the pack. Graduates in these fields are commanding six-figure salaries just years after entering the workforce, a reflection of both technological demand and economic pragmatism.
But this reliance on STEM as the golden ticket to success has sparked fierce debate. Are there truly not enough American engineers and scientists to meet industry needs? Or is the shortage narrative merely a myth used to justify policy changes and immigration reforms?
The STEM shortage debate
The National Science Board’s March 2024 report offered a candid assessment of the country’s technological dependency. Conservative voices offer a starkly different perspective. The Center for Immigration Studies, in an August 2024 report, dismissed the idea of a STEM worker shortage, citing wage stagnation and surging degree completions as signs that the labor pool is already saturated.
The divide highlights a broader tension in the national dialogue: Whether America’s education crisis stems from a lack of skills or a lack of equitable opportunity.
When majors become market strategies
In an environment defined by financial pressure, students are turning their majors into market bets. PayScale’s 2021–22 College Salary Report, which analyzed data from 3.5 million graduates, ranked the degrees that yield the highest returns. The findings confirmed that engineering, computer science, and quantitative disciplines remain the most lucrative.
Top-performing fields according to Payscale's College Salary Report:
- Petroleum Engineering: Mid-career pay of $187,300; early career $93,200.
- Operations Research & Industrial Engineering: Mid-career $170,400; early career $84,800.
- Electrical Engineering & Computer Science: Mid-career $159,300; early career $108,500.
- Interaction Design: Mid-career $155,800; early career $68,300.
- Public Accounting: Mid-career $147,700; early career $59,800.
Interestingly, non-STEM majors such as political economy and pharmacy also made the list, showing that intellectual disciplines rooted in policy and medicine still hold economic weight.
The cost of exclusion
For low-income and first-generation students, however, this shift toward profit-driven degrees may feel like an exclusionary game. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act , by slashing need-based grants, has made it harder for these students to pursue high-return majors that often require access to elite institutions and expensive preparatory programs.
The language of return
Once upon a time, college was spoken of in moral and intellectual terms, a place to discover purpose, expand knowledge, and challenge norms. But the lexicon has changed. In today’s America, education is increasingly described in the language of markets and returns.
Still, beneath the cynicism, a quiet resistance is growing. Many students are blending practicality with purpose, merging technology with the arts, business with social sciences, or design with data analytics. Their approach reflects a more nuanced understanding: That economic survival and intellectual fulfillment need not be mutually exclusive.
This generation’s recalibration of ambition may well redefine what higher education means in America. In a system skewed toward privilege and profit, their choices signal a deeper awakening, one that values adaptability, interdisciplinary thought, and the pursuit of knowledge as both a livelihood and a legacy.
Next Story