Teachers face firings over social media posts after Charlie Kirk's assassination
The assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University on September 10, 2025, has triggered a nationwide wave of disciplinary action against educators. Teachers, professors, and school staff across the United States have been fired, suspended, or investigated for social media posts deemed insensitive, derogatory, or celebratory of Kirk’s death. This controversy highlights the fraught intersection of free speech, professional ethics, and political polarisation in public education.
Surge in disciplinary actionsSince Kirk’s death, at least 15 educators have faced termination or administrative leave for comments made online. Cases span public schools, colleges, and universities in states including Tennessee, Florida, Texas, South Carolina, New York, California, Iowa, and North Carolina.
University of Mississippi: Assistant dean terminated following insensitive social media comments. Classroom teachers have not been immune. In Greenville County, South Carolina, social studies teacher Wynne Boliek was dismissed for a Facebook post stating, “America became better today. There I said it.” In Florida’s Clay County, a teacher was suspended for posting, “This may not be the obituary we were all hoping to wake up to, but this is a close second for me.” Texas’ Klein Independent School District terminated a staff member over “senseless and completely unacceptable” remarks, while in New York, a physics teacher faced suspension after making crude comments online and wearing a T-shirt mocking Kirk’s assassination.
State-level responses and investigationsSeveral states, including Florida, Texas, and California, have issued memos emphasizing professional decorum and launched formal investigations into educators’ social media conduct linked to the Kirk controversy. School districts and universities have condemned posts perceived as praising political violence, reinforcing a zero-tolerance stance toward conduct deemed incompatible with public service and professional ethics.
Beyond education, other public sector employees—such as firefighters and military personnel—have also faced scrutiny for online comments about Kirk’s death, reflecting the broader national sensitivity to political violence and public expression.
Role of far-right activists and social media campaignsThe disciplinary surge has been fuelled in part by far-right activists and social media influencers who have identified, doxxed, and publicly shamed educators critical of Kirk. Figures such as Chaya Raichik (Libs of TikTok) and Laura Loomer encouraged followers to report these educators, leading directly to suspensions and terminations.
Dedicated accounts and websites documenting these posts have amplified pressure on schools and universities to act swiftly, contributing to the rapid nationwide disciplinary response.
Celebration of assassination sparks controversySeveral teachers publicly celebrated or mocked Kirk’s death, prompting social outrage and institutional action:
Iowa: Art teacher posted “one Nazi down” and was placed on administrative leave. Free speech and academic freedom debate The controversy has sparked a national debate over the balance between free speech and professional responsibility. Civil liberties advocates warn that mass disciplinary actions could infringe on First Amendment protections and chill open discourse in schools and universities. Conversely, conservative leaders argue that educators who appear to celebrate political violence undermine public trust and are unfit to serve students and communities.
The bottom lineThe response to Charlie Kirk’s assassination has unleashed an unprecedented wave of firings and suspensions among educators, reflecting the intense national debate over social media speech, political polarisation, and professional norms in public education. As investigations continue, these disciplinary actions raise broader questions about free expression, workplace accountability, and the increasingly politicised environment within U.S. schools and universities.
- Middle Tennessee State University: Staff member fired for “inappropriate and callous” remarks about Kirk.
- East Tennessee State University: Two faculty placed on administrative leave for posts stating “you reap what you sow” and calling Kirk’s death “a victory.”
State-level responses and investigationsSeveral states, including Florida, Texas, and California, have issued memos emphasizing professional decorum and launched formal investigations into educators’ social media conduct linked to the Kirk controversy. School districts and universities have condemned posts perceived as praising political violence, reinforcing a zero-tolerance stance toward conduct deemed incompatible with public service and professional ethics.
Beyond education, other public sector employees—such as firefighters and military personnel—have also faced scrutiny for online comments about Kirk’s death, reflecting the broader national sensitivity to political violence and public expression.
Role of far-right activists and social media campaignsThe disciplinary surge has been fuelled in part by far-right activists and social media influencers who have identified, doxxed, and publicly shamed educators critical of Kirk. Figures such as Chaya Raichik (Libs of TikTok) and Laura Loomer encouraged followers to report these educators, leading directly to suspensions and terminations.
Dedicated accounts and websites documenting these posts have amplified pressure on schools and universities to act swiftly, contributing to the rapid nationwide disciplinary response.
Celebration of assassination sparks controversySeveral teachers publicly celebrated or mocked Kirk’s death, prompting social outrage and institutional action:
- Massachusetts: Special education teacher recorded grinning and singing during news coverage.
- New York: Teacher called Kirk an “aspiring Goebbels” and posted “good riddance to bad garbage.”
- North Carolina: Department of Defense Education Activity teacher at Fort Bragg called Kirk “garbage” and hinted at violent solutions.
The bottom lineThe response to Charlie Kirk’s assassination has unleashed an unprecedented wave of firings and suspensions among educators, reflecting the intense national debate over social media speech, political polarisation, and professional norms in public education. As investigations continue, these disciplinary actions raise broader questions about free expression, workplace accountability, and the increasingly politicised environment within U.S. schools and universities.
Next Story