Aakash Chopra Questions KL Rahul’s Treatment After Century in IND vs NZ ODI
In the wake of an enthralling second ODI between India and New Zealand, former Indian opener Aakash Chopra raised pointed questions about how KL Rahul is being handled within the Indian cricket setup, sparking fresh debate on team strategy and player roles.
India’s second match in the three-game ODI series took place at the Niranjan Shah Stadium in Rajkot, where the hosts posted a competitive total of 284 for 7 batting first. Despite steady contributions from the top order, it was KL Rahul’s unbeaten 112 that anchored India’s innings after early setbacks. The wicketkeeper-batter’s century was his eighth ODI hundred and his first at Rajkot, marking a key milestone in his international career.
Rahul came to the crease under pressure, after early wickets of stalwarts like Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma left the middle order with significant responsibility. Demonstrating patience and skill on a slow, challenging pitch, he stitched crucial partnerships with Ravindra Jadeja and Nitish Kumar Reddy, lifting India to a strong total.
However, New Zealand chased down the target with authority, led by an unbeaten 131 from Daryl Mitchell, who guided his side to a seven-wicket victory, leveling the series 1-1. The visitors’ chase was impressive for its composure and strategic shot selection, ending the contest with more than two overs to spare.
While the match result sparked widespread tactical discussions, Chopra focused on the narrative surrounding KL Rahul’s role and treatment in the team. On his social media platform, he clarified that his critique was not aimed at senior batters Virat Kohli or Rohit Sharma but at broader strategic decisions regarding Rahul.
Despite delivering one of the standout performances of the match, Rahul’s place in the batting order and his utilisation have drawn criticism, with some experts questioning whether the team management is fully harnessing his potential. His remarkable century, scored under difficult conditions, showcased his ability to both anchor and accelerate the innings - qualities vital for India’s middle order stability.
Chopra’s comments reflect a wider debate about how India balances depth, experience, and strategic planning across formats. With the ODI series reflecting high competitive intensity, each player’s role becomes increasingly significant as India aims to build momentum ahead of the T20 World Cup and other major tournaments.
The conversation around Rahul’s treatment also coincides with evolving roles for senior players and emerging talents. As the Men in Blue strive for consistency, the management’s decisions on batting positions and player roles have come under growing scrutiny, especially when performances like Rahul’s indicate a value that should be fully leveraged.
As the series now heads to the decider in Indore, India will be hoping that performances - not just praise or questions, guide future selection choices. Meanwhile, Rahul’s century remains a highlight, even if it arrived on a losing night, and Chopra’s comments only amplify the ongoing discussion about India’s strategic approach in limited-overs cricket.
India’s second match in the three-game ODI series took place at the Niranjan Shah Stadium in Rajkot, where the hosts posted a competitive total of 284 for 7 batting first. Despite steady contributions from the top order, it was KL Rahul’s unbeaten 112 that anchored India’s innings after early setbacks. The wicketkeeper-batter’s century was his eighth ODI hundred and his first at Rajkot, marking a key milestone in his international career.
Rahul came to the crease under pressure, after early wickets of stalwarts like Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma left the middle order with significant responsibility. Demonstrating patience and skill on a slow, challenging pitch, he stitched crucial partnerships with Ravindra Jadeja and Nitish Kumar Reddy, lifting India to a strong total.
However, New Zealand chased down the target with authority, led by an unbeaten 131 from Daryl Mitchell, who guided his side to a seven-wicket victory, leveling the series 1-1. The visitors’ chase was impressive for its composure and strategic shot selection, ending the contest with more than two overs to spare.
While the match result sparked widespread tactical discussions, Chopra focused on the narrative surrounding KL Rahul’s role and treatment in the team. On his social media platform, he clarified that his critique was not aimed at senior batters Virat Kohli or Rohit Sharma but at broader strategic decisions regarding Rahul.
Despite delivering one of the standout performances of the match, Rahul’s place in the batting order and his utilisation have drawn criticism, with some experts questioning whether the team management is fully harnessing his potential. His remarkable century, scored under difficult conditions, showcased his ability to both anchor and accelerate the innings - qualities vital for India’s middle order stability.
Chopra’s comments reflect a wider debate about how India balances depth, experience, and strategic planning across formats. With the ODI series reflecting high competitive intensity, each player’s role becomes increasingly significant as India aims to build momentum ahead of the T20 World Cup and other major tournaments.
The conversation around Rahul’s treatment also coincides with evolving roles for senior players and emerging talents. As the Men in Blue strive for consistency, the management’s decisions on batting positions and player roles have come under growing scrutiny, especially when performances like Rahul’s indicate a value that should be fully leveraged.
As the series now heads to the decider in Indore, India will be hoping that performances - not just praise or questions, guide future selection choices. Meanwhile, Rahul’s century remains a highlight, even if it arrived on a losing night, and Chopra’s comments only amplify the ongoing discussion about India’s strategic approach in limited-overs cricket.
Next Story