Kia Syros Or Skoda Kylaq? A Detailed Specification Breakdown
Kia Syros Or Skoda Kylaq ? The compact SUV market is heating up, with two new contenders making their presence known in the sub-four-metre segment. Kia's Syros and Skoda's Kylaq are the latest entrants that are set to rival established models like the Hyundai Venue, Tata Nexon, and Maruti Suzuki Brezza. Both vehicles bring a fresh perspective to the segment, with unique features, engine options, and competitive pricing. Let’s dive deeper into a comprehensive comparison of their engine specifications, fuel efficiency, variants, and prices.
Engine Specifications: Power and Performance
The Kia Syros offers two engine choices, catering to a range of driving preferences. The first option is a 1.0-litre, 3-cylinder turbo-petrol engine, producing a healthy 120 horsepower and 172Nm of torque. This engine can be paired with a 6-speed manual transmission or a 7-speed dual-clutch automatic. The second option is a 1.5-litre, 4-cylinder turbo-diesel engine, delivering 115 horsepower and 250Nm of torque. The diesel engine is available with either a 6-speed manual or a 6-speed torque converter automatic gearbox. Notably, the petrol engine is shared with the Hyundai i20 N-line, Hyundai Venue, and the Kia Sonet, while the diesel engine also powers the Hyundai Venue, Creta, Carens, Seltos, and Sonet.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kylaq comes with a single engine variant – a 1.0-litre, 3-cylinder turbo-petrol engine, producing 115 horsepower and 178Nm of torque. This engine is mated to either a 6-speed manual or a 6-speed torque converter automatic transmission. This engine is also found in the Skoda Kushaq, Slavia, Volkswagen Virtus, and Taigun. While the Kylaq’s engine offers slightly lower power than the Syros’ petrol variant, it still positions itself as a strong contender in the sub-compact SUV category.
Fuel Efficiency: Which One Goes Further?
When it comes to fuel efficiency, both the Kia Syros and Skoda Kylaq offer respectable figures. The Syros’ 1.0-litre turbo-petrol variant achieves a fuel efficiency of 18.2 km/l with the 6-speed manual gearbox and 17.68 km/l with the 7-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission. The 1.5-litre diesel variant is the most fuel-efficient of the bunch, offering 20.75 km/l with the 6-speed manual transmission and 17.65 km/l with the 6-speed automatic gearbox.
In comparison, the Skoda Kylaq’s 1.0-litre turbo-petrol engine delivers a slightly better fuel economy. The manual version offers 19.68 km/l, while the torque converter automatic delivers 19.05 km/l. Although both vehicles are fairly fuel-efficient, the Kylaq edges ahead in terms of petrol engine performance and fuel consumption, especially with its manual variant.
Pricing and Variants: Value for Money
In terms of pricing, the Skoda Kylaq is available in four trims: Classic, Signature, Signature Plus, and Prestige. The entry-level Classic trim is priced at Rs 7.89 lakh, while the top-of-the-line Prestige variant is priced at Rs 13.35 lakh. The automatic variants are priced higher, with the AT versions of the Signature Plus and Prestige trims reaching Rs 12.40 lakh and Rs 14.4 lakh, respectively (all prices ex-showroom).
Kia has yet to reveal the exact pricing for the Syros, but it is offered in six variants: HTK, HTK (O), HTK Plus, HTX, HTX Plus, and HTX Plus (O). The prices are set to be announced on February 3, 2025, but the Syros will likely be positioned in a similar range, aiming to compete with the Kylaq and its rivals in the segment.
When comparing the Kia Syros and Skoda Kylaq, both SUVs offer a compelling blend of performance, fuel efficiency, and features. The Kia Syros shines with a wider range of engine options, including a diesel variant, while the Skoda Kylaq offers slightly better fuel efficiency in its petrol engine lineup. Both vehicles come with a range of variants, allowing customers to choose based on their budget and requirements.
While the pricing of the Syros has yet to be revealed, the Skoda Kylaq provides a clear indication of the competitive pricing structure for sub-four-metre SUVs. Ultimately, the decision will come down to personal preference, with the Syros potentially attracting buyers looking for a larger engine variety, while the Kylaq offers a more fuel-efficient petrol option.
Engine Specifications: Power and Performance
The Kia Syros offers two engine choices, catering to a range of driving preferences. The first option is a 1.0-litre, 3-cylinder turbo-petrol engine, producing a healthy 120 horsepower and 172Nm of torque. This engine can be paired with a 6-speed manual transmission or a 7-speed dual-clutch automatic. The second option is a 1.5-litre, 4-cylinder turbo-diesel engine, delivering 115 horsepower and 250Nm of torque. The diesel engine is available with either a 6-speed manual or a 6-speed torque converter automatic gearbox. Notably, the petrol engine is shared with the Hyundai i20 N-line, Hyundai Venue, and the Kia Sonet, while the diesel engine also powers the Hyundai Venue, Creta, Carens, Seltos, and Sonet.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kylaq comes with a single engine variant – a 1.0-litre, 3-cylinder turbo-petrol engine, producing 115 horsepower and 178Nm of torque. This engine is mated to either a 6-speed manual or a 6-speed torque converter automatic transmission. This engine is also found in the Skoda Kushaq, Slavia, Volkswagen Virtus, and Taigun. While the Kylaq’s engine offers slightly lower power than the Syros’ petrol variant, it still positions itself as a strong contender in the sub-compact SUV category.
You may also like
- Hyundai Verna Facelift Arrives, Maintaining Sedan Segment Appeal
- Planning to Buy the Tata Curvv? Check the Monthly EMI Before Taking a Loan
- Hatchback, Sedan, SUV or Coupe: Understanding the Different Types of Cars
- Explained: Why a Chinese Battery Is Used in a Made-in-India EV and How Safe It Is in Extreme Heat
- New Renault Duster to Launch in India on March 17; Developed with IIT Kanpur's Wind Tunnel Technology
Fuel Efficiency: Which One Goes Further?
When it comes to fuel efficiency, both the Kia Syros and Skoda Kylaq offer respectable figures. The Syros’ 1.0-litre turbo-petrol variant achieves a fuel efficiency of 18.2 km/l with the 6-speed manual gearbox and 17.68 km/l with the 7-speed dual-clutch automatic transmission. The 1.5-litre diesel variant is the most fuel-efficient of the bunch, offering 20.75 km/l with the 6-speed manual transmission and 17.65 km/l with the 6-speed automatic gearbox.
In comparison, the Skoda Kylaq’s 1.0-litre turbo-petrol engine delivers a slightly better fuel economy. The manual version offers 19.68 km/l, while the torque converter automatic delivers 19.05 km/l. Although both vehicles are fairly fuel-efficient, the Kylaq edges ahead in terms of petrol engine performance and fuel consumption, especially with its manual variant.
Pricing and Variants: Value for Money
In terms of pricing, the Skoda Kylaq is available in four trims: Classic, Signature, Signature Plus, and Prestige. The entry-level Classic trim is priced at Rs 7.89 lakh, while the top-of-the-line Prestige variant is priced at Rs 13.35 lakh. The automatic variants are priced higher, with the AT versions of the Signature Plus and Prestige trims reaching Rs 12.40 lakh and Rs 14.4 lakh, respectively (all prices ex-showroom).
Kia has yet to reveal the exact pricing for the Syros, but it is offered in six variants: HTK, HTK (O), HTK Plus, HTX, HTX Plus, and HTX Plus (O). The prices are set to be announced on February 3, 2025, but the Syros will likely be positioned in a similar range, aiming to compete with the Kylaq and its rivals in the segment.
When comparing the Kia Syros and Skoda Kylaq, both SUVs offer a compelling blend of performance, fuel efficiency, and features. The Kia Syros shines with a wider range of engine options, including a diesel variant, while the Skoda Kylaq offers slightly better fuel efficiency in its petrol engine lineup. Both vehicles come with a range of variants, allowing customers to choose based on their budget and requirements.
While the pricing of the Syros has yet to be revealed, the Skoda Kylaq provides a clear indication of the competitive pricing structure for sub-four-metre SUVs. Ultimately, the decision will come down to personal preference, with the Syros potentially attracting buyers looking for a larger engine variety, while the Kylaq offers a more fuel-efficient petrol option.









