Direct vs Regular Mutual Funds: Why Switching Plans Could Trigger A Tax Bill

Direct And Regular Plans Are Not Tax-Neutral Switches

The important point for investors is that a switch between regular and direct plans is treated as a redemption of the existing units and a fresh purchase of the new plan.

According to wealth-management experts, direct and regular plans have different International Securities Identification Numbers (ISINs). For tax purposes, they are consequently treated as separate investments.

This means an investor cannot simply assume that changing the plan type leaves the original investment untouched from a taxation perspective. The same principle applies when moving in the opposite direction, from a direct plan to a regular plan.

The tax treatment is also relevant when investors switch between different options, such as Growth and Income Distribution cum Capital Withdrawal (IDCW), where the relevant plans have separate ISINs.

Capital Gains Can Become Taxable

When units in the existing plan are redeemed as part of the switch, any applicable capital gain is considered in the financial year in which the transaction takes place.

For equity mutual funds, the holding period is important. Units held for more than 12 months are generally classified as long-term, while units held for 12 months or less are treated as short-term.

Under the current tax framework, long-term capital gains on specified equity-oriented investments are taxed at 12.5% above the applicable annual exemption threshold of ₹1.25 lakh.

Therefore, an investor considering a switch should first calculate the unrealised gain on the regular plan and check how much of the annual long-term capital gains exemption has already been used through other investments.

When A Switch May Not Create A Tax Bill

There are situations in which switching may result in no capital gains tax.

If the investment has generated no gain, there is no capital gain on which tax would arise. Similarly, for eligible equity investments held for more than 12 months, an investor may have no tax liability if their aggregate long-term capital gains for the financial year remain within the ₹1.25 lakh exemption.

However, investors should calculate their overall capital gains rather than looking at the individual mutual fund investment in isolation.

Lower Expenses Do Not Guarantee Immediate Benefits

The attraction of direct plans largely comes from their lower expense ratio. Since fewer expenses are deducted from the scheme, the difference can potentially improve returns over a sufficiently long period.

But switching has an immediate cost if capital gains tax becomes payable. According to financial experts, the key question is therefore not simply whether the direct plan is cheaper, but how long the savings from its lower expense ratio will take to compensate for the tax paid during the switch.

Consider a hypothetical ₹1 lakh investment in a large-cap equity mutual fund. Assume the regular plan has an expense ratio of 1%, while its direct counterpart charges 0.5%. If the underlying portfolio earns 10% before expenses, the assumed annualised returns after expenses would be around 9% for the regular plan and 9.5% for the direct plan.

After two years, the regular investment would be worth approximately ₹1.19 lakh. That represents a gain of about ₹18,800. If the investor has already exhausted the ₹1.25 lakh annual long-term capital gains exemption, tax at 12.5% on this gain would be roughly ₹2,350.

That would leave approximately ₹1,16,450 to invest in the direct plan.

Under these assumptions, the direct plan could take around four to five years to recover the initial tax disadvantage through its lower expenses. The exact break-even period, however, would change with investment returns, expense ratios and tax circumstances.

What Investors Should Check Before Switching

The expense ratio should be only one part of the decision. Investors should first examine the fund's historical performance and whether its investment strategy remains suitable for their objectives.

Another consideration is the role played by the distributor. Industry experts note that some investors may value services such as fund selection, portfolio reviews, asset-allocation guidance and investment discipline provided through a regular plan.

The potential tax bill should then be calculated alongside any applicable exit load. Investors should also compare the tax-adjusted amount that can actually be moved into the direct plan with the expected annual savings from its lower expense ratio.

The investment horizon is particularly important. If the expected holding period is shorter than the estimated break-even period, switching may not provide a meaningful financial advantage.

SIP Investors Need Extra Caution

Investors using systematic investment plans (SIPs) should pay particular attention to the First-In, First-Out (FIFO) method used for determining which units are considered sold.

Different instalments may have different purchase dates and therefore different holding periods. As a result, a switch could involve units with different tax treatments.

Any applicable exit load should also be checked before initiating the transaction. The cost of switching can therefore vary considerably depending on when individual units were purchased.

Ultimately, moving from a regular to a direct mutual fund plan can make sense for some investors, particularly when the lower expense ratio is expected to provide meaningful savings over a long horizon. But a switch should not be made solely because the direct plan has a lower cost. Tax liability, exit load, investment horizon, distributor support and the expected break-even period all deserve consideration before making the move.

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment, tax or financial advice. Investors should assess their individual circumstances and consult a qualified financial or tax professional before making investment decisions.

Image Courtesy: Meta AI