Retirement Portfolio 2026: How Much Equity Should You Hold From Age 25 To 60?

Why Equity Has A Role In Retirement Planning

The choice between equity and fixed income is not simply about risk versus safety. It is also about the length of time the money will remain invested.

Equity-oriented investments have the potential to deliver stronger long-term growth, although returns are market-linked and can fluctuate significantly. Fixed-income avenues, meanwhile, can provide greater stability and predictability, making them useful for managing risk.

For retirement planning, this distinction becomes particularly important because a portfolio may need to fund expenses for several decades.

EPF, Public Provident Fund (PPF) and fixed deposits can form part of the relatively stable portion of a portfolio. Equity can take a larger role during the accumulation years, when an investor has more time to withstand market downturns.

According to experts, the objective should not be to chase the highest possible return. Instead, investors need to consider their risk appetite, investment horizon, financial commitments and retirement target.

The Power Of Compounding Over Three Decades

The difference between a moderate and a higher long-term return can become substantial when investments remain untouched for many years.

For instance, an investment of Rs 20,000 every month for 30 years at an assumed annual return of 7% could grow to roughly Rs 2.4 crore.

If the same monthly investment earned an assumed 12% annual return over the same period, the resulting corpus could be close to Rs 7 crore, depending on the compounding methodology and timing of investments.

These are illustrations rather than guaranteed outcomes. Equity returns are not fixed, and actual results can vary considerably.

The example nevertheless highlights why growth assets can have an important place in a retirement portfolio when the investment horizon is long.

Age 25: Consider A Higher Equity Allocation

Someone beginning retirement investments at 25 could potentially have 30 to 35 years before reaching retirement.

With such a long horizon, experts have suggested an allocation of around 80% equity and 20% debt for an investor who has a high risk tolerance and can remain invested through market cycles.

The larger equity component is aimed at long-term capital growth and gives the portfolio more time to benefit from compounding.

The debt allocation can provide greater stability and liquidity. It can also serve as a source of funds for requirements that should not necessarily be met by selling equity during a market correction.

However, an 80:20 allocation is not suitable for every 25-year-old. Risk tolerance, income stability and other financial obligations should be considered before adopting an aggressive portfolio.

Around 35: Begin Reducing Equity Gradually

The portfolio need not remain at its initial allocation forever.

As an investor moves into their mid-30s, the retirement corpus may have become considerably larger. A major market decline at this stage can have a more noticeable impact on accumulated wealth than it did when the portfolio was relatively small.

Experts have suggested gradually moving towards approximately 70% equity and 30% debt around this stage.

This gradual transition is often described as a glide path. Instead of waiting until retirement and making a sudden shift from equity to fixed income, the investor progressively reduces portfolio risk over the years.

The change should be gradual rather than mechanical. A person with a higher risk capacity and a later retirement target may have different requirements from someone planning to retire early.

Age 45: Move Towards A More Balanced Portfolio

By 45, retirement could be roughly 15 years away for someone planning to stop working at 60.

At this point, an allocation of around 60% equity and 40% debt has been suggested by experts as a broad framework.

Equity still has a meaningful role because the retirement corpus may need to grow for another decade or more and then support the investor for many years after retirement.

At the same time, increasing the debt allocation can provide a larger cushion against market volatility.

The objective at this stage is to protect a growing corpus without giving up the long-term growth potential needed to deal with inflation.

Age 55: Protect More Of The Accumulated Wealth

The balance can shift further towards fixed income as retirement gets closer.

For an investor around 55, experts have suggested an allocation of approximately 40% equity and 60% debt.

The reasoning is straightforward: there is less time available to recover from a major equity market fall before withdrawals begin.

A larger debt component can help provide stability and liquidity during the transition into retirement.

That does not mean equity should disappear. Keeping a portion invested in growth-oriented assets can remain relevant because retirement itself may last for several decades.

Age 60: Why Some Equity May Still Be Necessary

Reaching retirement age does not necessarily mean moving the entire portfolio into fixed-income investments.

Experts have suggested retaining around 20% to 30% in equity even around age 60, depending on the investor's circumstances and risk tolerance.

One reason is inflation.

If a portfolio earns 6% or 7% while inflation is also running at a similar level, the investor's purchasing power may not grow meaningfully. Taxes and other costs can further reduce the effective return available to meet expenses.

Mrin Agarwal, as cited in the original discussion, stressed the importance of looking at post-tax returns rather than focusing only on headline returns.

For a retirement portfolio, the relevant question is whether the money can maintain its purchasing power over time.

Age-Wise Equity And Debt Allocation

Age	Equity	Debt	Broad objective
25	Around 80%	Around 20%	Focus on long-term growth and compounding
35	Around 70%	Around 30%	Begin reducing portfolio risk
45	Around 60%	Around 40%	Balance growth and stability
55	Around 40%	Around 60%	Protect a larger accumulated corpus
60	Around 20–30%	Around 70–80%	Retain growth potential while prioritising stability

These figures are broad allocations discussed by experts and should not be treated as personalised investment recommendations.

How Monthly Investments Can Produce Different Corpus Sizes

The impact of asset allocation becomes clearer when monthly contributions are considered over long periods.

Suppose an investor puts Rs 25,000 every month into retirement investments for 25 years.

Under a hypothetical 7% annual return assumption, the accumulated corpus could be around Rs 2.5 crore.

At a hypothetical 10% return, the figure could rise to roughly Rs 3.3 crore.

At 12%, the corpus could approach Rs 4.7 crore.

These numbers demonstrate the effect of compounding and assumed returns, but they should not be interpreted as expected or guaranteed investment outcomes.

Higher return assumptions generally involve greater investment risk, particularly when they depend heavily on equity exposure.

EPF, PPF And NPS Can Play Different Roles

Retirement planning in India can involve several investment avenues rather than relying on a single product.

EPF and PPF are commonly associated with the more stable part of a long-term portfolio, while NPS can have exposure to equity depending on the investment choice.

NPS, therefore, should not automatically be categorised as a fixed-income investment.

The choice of asset allocation within NPS can influence its return potential and volatility. Its retirement-oriented structure can also encourage investors to stay invested for the long term.

According to experts, avoiding unnecessary withdrawals from retirement investments can be particularly important because removing money early can reduce the benefit of future compounding.

Why Early Withdrawals Can Hurt The Final Corpus

Consider an investor who has accumulated a substantial EPF balance and decides to withdraw a significant portion before retirement.

The immediate benefit may be useful for a major financial requirement, but the withdrawn money will no longer remain invested in the retirement account.

The effect can extend well beyond the amount taken out because the money also loses the opportunity to generate future returns.

An illustration discussed by the experts showed how an EPF corpus could potentially reach around Rs 2.15 crore for a 45-year-old who continues contributing until retirement, while a midway withdrawal of Rs 50 lakh could reduce the eventual corpus by around Rs 1 crore.

The actual impact would depend on contributions, interest rates, time period and other factors. The illustration primarily demonstrates the cost of interrupting long-term compounding.

PPF Shows The Importance Of Staying Invested

PPF provides another illustration of how regular contributions can build a sizeable corpus over an extended period.

If an investor contributes Rs 1.5 lakh annually for 25 years and earns an assumed 7% return, the resulting corpus could be around Rs 1 crore.

The calculation is based on an assumed rate and should not be viewed as a guaranteed future value.

Equity may offer greater long-term growth potential, but it also comes with market risk. This is why experts often emphasise combining growth assets with more stable investments rather than relying exclusively on one category.

Inflation Should Shape Retirement Decisions

A retirement corpus needs to do more than preserve its nominal value.

Expenses generally rise over time, which means an investor who retires with a certain monthly budget may require considerably more money several years later.

This is one reason experts caution against making retirement decisions solely on the basis of nominal returns.

A portfolio earning 7% is not necessarily delivering a 7% improvement in purchasing power if inflation is consuming a large part of that return. Taxation can reduce the effective return further.

According to experts, investors should ideally seek a long-term return that stays meaningfully above inflation, with a margin of around 2 to 3 percentage points sometimes used as a broad planning objective.

The actual margin required will vary depending on inflation, taxation, asset allocation and individual spending needs.

A Larger Retirement Target Requires Growth

Retirement requirements can be particularly high for people living in major Indian cities, where housing, healthcare and other expenses can consume a substantial portion of household income.

For some investors, the target retirement corpus may run into several crores, with estimates of Rs 6 crore to Rs 10 crore being considered in certain planning scenarios.

Building such a corpus over a long working life may require meaningful exposure to growth assets.

That does not mean putting the entire portfolio into equity. Instead, experts recommend considering a mix that changes as the investor moves closer to retirement.

Retirement Allocation Should Evolve With You

There is no single equity percentage that is appropriate for everyone at a particular age.

The age-based framework of roughly 80% equity at 25, 70% around 35, 60% at 45, 40% at 55 and 20% to 30% around 60 provides a broad way to think about changing risk levels.

However, retirement age, income, existing savings, liabilities, dependants and tolerance for market volatility can all alter the appropriate allocation.

The broader principle is to use the early years to pursue long-term growth, progressively build stability as retirement approaches and retain enough growth exposure after retirement to address inflation.

For investors, the most important step is to review the portfolio periodically rather than allowing the original asset allocation to remain unchanged for decades.

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered investment or financial advice. The return figures and asset allocations mentioned are illustrative and based on assumptions or broad expert guidance. Actual returns and suitable asset allocation can vary according to market conditions and individual circumstances.

Image Courtesy: Meta AI