Christianity, extremism, and a TikTok: Why a University of North Georgia textbook is at the centre of outrage
A brief TikTok video recorded in a University of North Georgia (UNG) classroom has escalated into a national controversy, igniting a fierce debate about faith, extremism, and higher education.
Recently, a UNG student filmed herself reacting in disbelief to a passage in her global identities textbook. The line in question defined “Christian Identity” not as a broad expression of faith but as a US-based white supremacist movement—an extremist ideology documented for decades by groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).
In the student’s short clip, the parenthetical note, “Christian Identity (a US-based white supremacist group )”, appeared on the screen, followed by her visible shock. What might have been a fleeting student reaction quickly morphed into a viral flashpoint once the video began circulating widely on TikTok. Within hours, it had been shared across multiple platforms, drawing tens of thousands of views and engagements. Many commenters accused the university of equating Christianity itself with white supremacy , while others defended the textbook as an accurate reflection of extremist ideologies that co-opt religious language.
Why it struck a nerveThe outrage speaks less to the textbook line itself—which distinguishes a radical theological movement from mainstream Christianity—than to the raw politics surrounding higher education in Georgia and across the US For many viewers unfamiliar with the history of “Christian Identity,” the juxtaposition of “Christian” and “white supremacist” appeared to cast Christianity in general as extremist.
That ambiguity fuelled a storm of criticism. Commenters online accused UNG of indoctrination and anti-Christian bias. Some went further, calling for the state to defund Georgia’s public universities altogether. To critics, the textbook represented yet another example of academia targeting traditional faith.
The other side of the debateBut academics and watchdog groups stress that “Christian Identity” refers to a fringe but dangerous movement rooted in racist reinterpretations of scripture—not to Christianity as a whole. According to the SPLC, adherents of the ideology claim that white Europeans are God’s chosen people, while Jews and non-white groups are considered inferior or evil. The ideology has inspired acts of violence and has been closely monitored by hate-group trackers for decades.
Faculty members and education experts argue that distinguishing such movements from mainstream faith traditions is standard practice in courses on global identity, religion, and extremism. To them, the outrage reflects a broader misunderstanding of academic frameworks and the challenges of teaching about extremist ideologies in politically charged times.
Yet that nuance has been drowned out on social media. A three-second textbook excerpt, stripped of classroom context, spread faster than any professor’s explanation ever could.
A flashpoint in Georgia’s higher ed warsThe UNG uproar comes at a time of heightened scrutiny for Georgia’s public universities. Lawmakers and advocacy groups have been pressuring institutions to defend their budgets, curricula, and teaching on issues related to race, gender, and religion. The viral TikTok has now become another weapon in that broader battle, with critics holding it up as evidence of ideological bias in higher education.
As of now, UNG has not issued an official statement. Internally, faculty and students are watching closely to see how administrators respond. The controversy shows no sign of subsiding, as debates over religion, extremism, and academic freedom converge in a single viral moment.
Whether viewed as proof of liberal bias or as a case study in how extremist groups co-opt religious symbols, the viral clip has turned a textbook footnote into a political flashpoint. It underscores how quickly classroom material, once confined to the academic sphere, can explode into the national conversation in an era when a student’s TikTok can spark outrage far beyond campus walls.
Recently, a UNG student filmed herself reacting in disbelief to a passage in her global identities textbook. The line in question defined “Christian Identity” not as a broad expression of faith but as a US-based white supremacist movement—an extremist ideology documented for decades by groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).
In the student’s short clip, the parenthetical note, “Christian Identity (a US-based white supremacist group )”, appeared on the screen, followed by her visible shock. What might have been a fleeting student reaction quickly morphed into a viral flashpoint once the video began circulating widely on TikTok. Within hours, it had been shared across multiple platforms, drawing tens of thousands of views and engagements. Many commenters accused the university of equating Christianity itself with white supremacy , while others defended the textbook as an accurate reflection of extremist ideologies that co-opt religious language.
Why it struck a nerveThe outrage speaks less to the textbook line itself—which distinguishes a radical theological movement from mainstream Christianity—than to the raw politics surrounding higher education in Georgia and across the US For many viewers unfamiliar with the history of “Christian Identity,” the juxtaposition of “Christian” and “white supremacist” appeared to cast Christianity in general as extremist.
That ambiguity fuelled a storm of criticism. Commenters online accused UNG of indoctrination and anti-Christian bias. Some went further, calling for the state to defund Georgia’s public universities altogether. To critics, the textbook represented yet another example of academia targeting traditional faith.
The other side of the debateBut academics and watchdog groups stress that “Christian Identity” refers to a fringe but dangerous movement rooted in racist reinterpretations of scripture—not to Christianity as a whole. According to the SPLC, adherents of the ideology claim that white Europeans are God’s chosen people, while Jews and non-white groups are considered inferior or evil. The ideology has inspired acts of violence and has been closely monitored by hate-group trackers for decades.
Faculty members and education experts argue that distinguishing such movements from mainstream faith traditions is standard practice in courses on global identity, religion, and extremism. To them, the outrage reflects a broader misunderstanding of academic frameworks and the challenges of teaching about extremist ideologies in politically charged times.
Yet that nuance has been drowned out on social media. A three-second textbook excerpt, stripped of classroom context, spread faster than any professor’s explanation ever could.
A flashpoint in Georgia’s higher ed warsThe UNG uproar comes at a time of heightened scrutiny for Georgia’s public universities. Lawmakers and advocacy groups have been pressuring institutions to defend their budgets, curricula, and teaching on issues related to race, gender, and religion. The viral TikTok has now become another weapon in that broader battle, with critics holding it up as evidence of ideological bias in higher education.
As of now, UNG has not issued an official statement. Internally, faculty and students are watching closely to see how administrators respond. The controversy shows no sign of subsiding, as debates over religion, extremism, and academic freedom converge in a single viral moment.
Whether viewed as proof of liberal bias or as a case study in how extremist groups co-opt religious symbols, the viral clip has turned a textbook footnote into a political flashpoint. It underscores how quickly classroom material, once confined to the academic sphere, can explode into the national conversation in an era when a student’s TikTok can spark outrage far beyond campus walls.
Next Story