Faculty under fire: These US universities have fired staff for comments on Charlie Kirk's assassination
The assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk has not only shocked the political world but also unleashed a storm across American higher education. In the days since Kirk’s killing, universities and colleges nationwide have disciplined, suspended, or outright dismissed faculty and staff who made remarks online that were perceived as mocking, insensitive, or celebratory. What began as scattered disciplinary actions has now snowballed into a nationwide clash over free speech, academic freedom , and political pressure on universities.
At the heart of the debate lies a fundamental question: how far should institutions go in policing the online speech of their employees, especially when personal remarks touch on polarising political events?
Clemson University : Suspension under political spotlightAs reported by Politico, Clemson University in South Carolina has emerged as one of the most high-profile cases. Several staff members were suspended after social media posts about Kirk’s death went viral, with the school confirming that investigations were underway. The backlash intensified when House Judiciary Republicans publicly called for Clemson to lose federal funding if it failed to act. Senator Lindsey Graham also weighed in, denouncing the posts as “inhumane and indefensible.”
Caught between political firestorms and campus free speech debates, Clemson’s administration emphasised that its decisions were guided by institutional values and workplace standards, though critics argue the university caved to partisan pressure.
Cumberland University : Firings in TennesseeIn Tennessee, Cumberland University terminated two staff members, including a professor and an esports coach, after their online remarks surfaced. The university said the comments were “inappropriate” and did not reflect the institution’s values. While the employees were not named, conservative activists quickly amplified their posts, calling for accountability and threatening boycotts.
The firings illustrate how smaller, private colleges are particularly vulnerable to reputational risks when national political controversies collide with campus life.
Middle Tennessee State University : An assistant dean dismissedMiddle Tennessee State University went further by dismissing an assistant dean for what officials described as “insensitive and callous remarks.” While the university has not detailed the content of the posts, state lawmakers were quick to demand action, pressuring administrators to make an example.
Unions and academic groups condemned the firing, warning that higher education institutions risk becoming tools for partisan score-settling rather than spaces of open dialogue.
University of Mississippi: Employee termination after resharingAt the University of Mississippi, an employee was terminated for resharing commentary that mocked Kirk’s assassination, as reported by CBS News. Although the post was not original, university leadership argued that amplifying such speech still undermined the institution’s reputation and violated professional standards.
This decision underscores how even indirect engagement, such as reposting or liking content, can now carry professional consequences for faculty and staff.
The politics of campus speechThese incidents are not isolated. According to NBC News, at least a dozen educators nationwide have been disciplined or fired since Kirk’s death, and investigations are ongoing at other institutions. The disciplinary actions have overwhelmingly occurred in southern and conservative states, where Republican lawmakers and political figures have been especially vocal in demanding consequences.
Senator Lindsey Graham, Representative Nancy Mace, and other GOP leaders have publicly argued that “free speech is not a shield for poor judgment,” suggesting that public employees must uphold higher standards of conduct.
By contrast, unions, faculty associations, and free speech advocates insist that universities are ceding ground to political intimidation. The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) warned that punishing staff for personal remarks could lead to a “chilling effect” in which educators censor themselves for fear of losing their jobs.
Cancel culture or accountability?The fallout has reignited the broader debate over cancel culture. Supporters of the firings argue that celebrating the death of a political figure crosses a moral and professional line, especially for those working with students. Critics counter that employment decisions are being driven not by internal standards but by external political campaigns, online doxxing, and media outrage.
Indeed, right-wing influencers and activists have played a central role in publicising offending posts, often sharing screenshots widely and tagging university officials until disciplinary action followed. This tactic—sometimes labeled “reverse cancel culture”—has blurred the boundary between legitimate accountability and targeted harassment.
At the heart of the debate lies a fundamental question: how far should institutions go in policing the online speech of their employees, especially when personal remarks touch on polarising political events?
Clemson University : Suspension under political spotlightAs reported by Politico, Clemson University in South Carolina has emerged as one of the most high-profile cases. Several staff members were suspended after social media posts about Kirk’s death went viral, with the school confirming that investigations were underway. The backlash intensified when House Judiciary Republicans publicly called for Clemson to lose federal funding if it failed to act. Senator Lindsey Graham also weighed in, denouncing the posts as “inhumane and indefensible.”
Caught between political firestorms and campus free speech debates, Clemson’s administration emphasised that its decisions were guided by institutional values and workplace standards, though critics argue the university caved to partisan pressure.
Cumberland University : Firings in TennesseeIn Tennessee, Cumberland University terminated two staff members, including a professor and an esports coach, after their online remarks surfaced. The university said the comments were “inappropriate” and did not reflect the institution’s values. While the employees were not named, conservative activists quickly amplified their posts, calling for accountability and threatening boycotts.
The firings illustrate how smaller, private colleges are particularly vulnerable to reputational risks when national political controversies collide with campus life.
Middle Tennessee State University : An assistant dean dismissedMiddle Tennessee State University went further by dismissing an assistant dean for what officials described as “insensitive and callous remarks.” While the university has not detailed the content of the posts, state lawmakers were quick to demand action, pressuring administrators to make an example.
Unions and academic groups condemned the firing, warning that higher education institutions risk becoming tools for partisan score-settling rather than spaces of open dialogue.
University of Mississippi: Employee termination after resharingAt the University of Mississippi, an employee was terminated for resharing commentary that mocked Kirk’s assassination, as reported by CBS News
This decision underscores how even indirect engagement, such as reposting or liking content, can now carry professional consequences for faculty and staff.
The politics of campus speechThese incidents are not isolated. According to NBC News, at least a dozen educators nationwide have been disciplined or fired since Kirk’s death, and investigations are ongoing at other institutions. The disciplinary actions have overwhelmingly occurred in southern and conservative states, where Republican lawmakers and political figures have been especially vocal in demanding consequences.
Senator Lindsey Graham, Representative Nancy Mace, and other GOP leaders have publicly argued that “free speech is not a shield for poor judgment,” suggesting that public employees must uphold higher standards of conduct.
By contrast, unions, faculty associations, and free speech advocates insist that universities are ceding ground to political intimidation. The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) warned that punishing staff for personal remarks could lead to a “chilling effect” in which educators censor themselves for fear of losing their jobs.
Indeed, right-wing influencers and activists have played a central role in publicising offending posts, often sharing screenshots widely and tagging university officials until disciplinary action followed. This tactic—sometimes labeled “reverse cancel culture”—has blurred the boundary between legitimate accountability and targeted harassment.
Next Story