DoT Imposes ₹2.13 Lakh Fine on Bharti Airtel for Violating Subscriber Verification Norms
Share this article:
The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has imposed penalties on Bharti Airtel for failing to follow mandatory subscriber verification procedures. Sample audits of Customer Application Forms (CAFs) revealed lapses, including incomplete details and missing identity or address proofs.
What DoT Found in Airtel’s CAF Audits
DoT’s audits identified several gaps in subscriber verification. Many CAFs were incomplete, missing essential details such as valid identity and address documents. In some cases, prescribed verification norms were ignored. These lapses breach the Licence Agreement, which mandates strict compliance to reduce fraud risks and ensure traceability.
Airtel’s Response to DoT Penalties
Airtel has received multiple notices across states including Delhi, Bihar, Punjab, and Uttar Pradesh (East), with varying fines in each. The company has accepted some penalties - such as a ₹1,31,000 fine in UP (East) - while contesting others, including those in Bihar. Airtel has stated that the financial impact will be limited to penalty payments and has indicated plans to strengthen its verification processes.
Why SIM Verification Norms Are Crucial for Security
Subscriber verification, covering both identity and address proofs, is vital to prevent fraud, misuse, and anonymous SIM activations. DoT’s stricter enforcement signals a warning to all telecom operators: lapses will not be overlooked. For consumers, this means stronger ‘Know Your Customer’ (KYC) compliance, potentially causing slightly longer activation times but offering greater security and data protection.
Impact on Airtel and the Telecom Sector
The penalties highlight the government’s push for tighter compliance across the telecom industry. For Airtel, this could lead to improved internal audits, stricter documentation checks, and the use of new technologies to streamline verification. For the broader telecom sector, the message is clear - subscriber security and regulatory adherence remain top priorities.
You may also like
- Charlie Kirk 'assassin' Tyler Robinson charged as prosecutors seek death penalty
- World Athletics C'ships: Sarvesh Kushare makes history, finishes sixth in high jump
- Love Is Blind's Kieran signed up for Love Island before marrying Megan on Netflix show
- BJP leaders reflect on PM Modi's enduring legacy on his 75th birthday
- India set to attract investments worth Rs 80 lakh crore in coming years: Sonowal
What DoT Found in Airtel’s CAF Audits
DoT’s audits identified several gaps in subscriber verification. Many CAFs were incomplete, missing essential details such as valid identity and address documents. In some cases, prescribed verification norms were ignored. These lapses breach the Licence Agreement, which mandates strict compliance to reduce fraud risks and ensure traceability.
Airtel’s Response to DoT Penalties
Airtel has received multiple notices across states including Delhi, Bihar, Punjab, and Uttar Pradesh (East), with varying fines in each. The company has accepted some penalties - such as a ₹1,31,000 fine in UP (East) - while contesting others, including those in Bihar. Airtel has stated that the financial impact will be limited to penalty payments and has indicated plans to strengthen its verification processes.
Why SIM Verification Norms Are Crucial for Security
Subscriber verification, covering both identity and address proofs, is vital to prevent fraud, misuse, and anonymous SIM activations. DoT’s stricter enforcement signals a warning to all telecom operators: lapses will not be overlooked. For consumers, this means stronger ‘Know Your Customer’ (KYC) compliance, potentially causing slightly longer activation times but offering greater security and data protection.
Impact on Airtel and the Telecom Sector
The penalties highlight the government’s push for tighter compliance across the telecom industry. For Airtel, this could lead to improved internal audits, stricter documentation checks, and the use of new technologies to streamline verification. For the broader telecom sector, the message is clear - subscriber security and regulatory adherence remain top priorities.