Why Starting A ₹5,000 SIP Just Three Years Earlier Could Create Nearly ₹80 Lakh More Wealth By Age 50
For many investors, delaying an investment decision by a year or two may not seem like a major concern. After all, a long financial journey often creates the impression that there will always be enough time to catch up later. However, according to experts, when it comes to long-term wealth creation through a Systematic Investment Plan (SIP), even a short delay can have a surprisingly large impact on the final corpus. A recent calculation demonstrates how postponing a ₹5 ,000 monthly SIP by just three years could potentially reduce the eventual corpus by nearly ₹80 lakh, under certain return assumptions.
Over extended periods, compounding can accelerate wealth creation significantly. The earlier an investor starts, the longer their money remains invested, allowing gains to build upon previous gains. This effect becomes increasingly visible during the later years of an investment journey.
According to experts, investors often focus heavily on return percentages while underestimating the importance of time. In reality, time and consistency can be just as influential as returns in determining the final outcome.
The first investor starts a SIP at the age of 25 with a monthly contribution of ₹5,000. Contributions increase by 10 per cent every year through a step-up feature. The investment continues for 25 years until the investor reaches the age of 50. Assuming an annual return of 12 per cent, the total amount invested over the period comes to ₹59,00,823.
Under these assumptions, the estimated gains generated through investment growth reach ₹1,54,76,906. As a result, the total corpus grows to approximately ₹2,13,77,730 by age 50.
The second investor follows the same approach but begins at the age of 28. Monthly contributions start at ₹5,000 and increase by 10 per cent annually. However, because of the later start, the investment period reduces to 22 years.
In this case, the total contribution amounts to ₹42,84,164. The estimated gains generated are around ₹93,02,011, resulting in a final corpus of approximately ₹1,35,86,176.
What makes this difference remarkable is that the gap is not solely due to the additional money invested during those three years. A significant portion comes from the extra compounding period enjoyed by the earlier investor.
According to experts, the final years of a long-term investment journey often contribute disproportionately to overall wealth creation because the accumulated corpus is already substantial. Missing even a few years at the beginning can therefore have a much larger impact than many investors realise.
In addition, market-linked investments often experience periods of volatility. Long-term investors benefit not only from compounding but also from participating in market recovery phases following downturns. Investors who stop investing during difficult periods may miss these recoveries, potentially affecting overall returns.
Why Time Is The Most Valuable Asset In Investing
Financial planners frequently emphasise that successful investing is not only about choosing the right investment vehicle but also about giving investments sufficient time to grow. The concept behind this is the power of compounding , where returns generated by an investment begin earning returns of their own.Over extended periods, compounding can accelerate wealth creation significantly. The earlier an investor starts, the longer their money remains invested, allowing gains to build upon previous gains. This effect becomes increasingly visible during the later years of an investment journey.
According to experts, investors often focus heavily on return percentages while underestimating the importance of time. In reality, time and consistency can be just as influential as returns in determining the final outcome.
A Comparison Between Starting At 25 And 28
To understand the impact of delayed investing, consider two individuals who follow the same investment strategy but begin at different ages.The first investor starts a SIP at the age of 25 with a monthly contribution of ₹5,000. Contributions increase by 10 per cent every year through a step-up feature. The investment continues for 25 years until the investor reaches the age of 50. Assuming an annual return of 12 per cent, the total amount invested over the period comes to ₹59,00,823.
Under these assumptions, the estimated gains generated through investment growth reach ₹1,54,76,906. As a result, the total corpus grows to approximately ₹2,13,77,730 by age 50.
The second investor follows the same approach but begins at the age of 28. Monthly contributions start at ₹5,000 and increase by 10 per cent annually. However, because of the later start, the investment period reduces to 22 years.
In this case, the total contribution amounts to ₹42,84,164. The estimated gains generated are around ₹93,02,011, resulting in a final corpus of approximately ₹1,35,86,176.
The ₹80 Lakh Difference Explained
The numbers reveal a striking difference. Despite starting only three years later, the second investor accumulates a corpus that is roughly ₹78 lakh to ₹80 lakh lower than the investor who started at age 25.What makes this difference remarkable is that the gap is not solely due to the additional money invested during those three years. A significant portion comes from the extra compounding period enjoyed by the earlier investor.
According to experts, the final years of a long-term investment journey often contribute disproportionately to overall wealth creation because the accumulated corpus is already substantial. Missing even a few years at the beginning can therefore have a much larger impact than many investors realise.
Consistency Matters As Much As Starting Early
Starting early is important, but maintaining regular contributions is equally critical. Investors who pause, discontinue or frequently interrupt their SIPs may lose valuable opportunities for compounding.In addition, market-linked investments often experience periods of volatility. Long-term investors benefit not only from compounding but also from participating in market recovery phases following downturns. Investors who stop investing during difficult periods may miss these recoveries, potentially affecting overall returns.
Next Story