Don't introduce third language in Class-9: SC judge tells Centre
Don't introduce third language in Class-9: SC judge tells Centre
Supreme Court judge Justice BV Nagarathna has raised concerns over the introduction of a third language in Class IX under the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) curriculum.
She said this policy adds unnecessary stress on students preparing for board examinations.
Her remarks came during a hearing on Tamil Nadu's appeal against a Madras High Court direction to set up Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs), which follows the three-language policy, in every district of the state.
Justice Nagarathna questioned timing of language policy
Although the validity of the CBSE language policy wasn't directly challenged in this case, Justice Nagarathna questioned its timing.
"Ninth standard is stressful. Why do you introduce a new language in 9th? You introduce it in 6th," she said.
The CBSE's three-language policy is currently being challenged in separate PILs before a bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant. The bench had refused to stay the implementation of the policy and posted the matter for hearing next week.
Judge suggested starting new language in Class VI instead
Addressing the Union government, Justice Nagarathna said, "Please don't have third language in 9th standard. CBSE, ICSE, State Board, 10th standard is a board exam. From...8th standard onwards, the pressure starts."
Recalling her own academic experience, she noted that pupils were introduced to Class 10 concepts as early as Class 8, preparing them for board examinations.
"So if we had that kind of preparation and all, what about today's students? Don't start a new language in 9th," she said.
Don't reject schemes just because they're from Centre: Justice Nagarathna
Justice Nagarathna also advised Tamil Nadu not to reject central schemes simply because they come from the Union government.
She said, "You may have your education system, but don't prevent the Central government schools."
"Don't have this attitude that it is the Union government, so why should we accept it," she added.