School PGI climbs, but learning score stays frozen
NEW DELHI: Chandigarh has become the first State/UT in the PGI 2.0 series to enter the top (Uttam) range, scoring 766 out of 1,000 in 2025-26. But a domain-wise reading of the union education ministry's latest Performance Grading Index 2.0 report released Tuesday shows the recent rise was driven mainly by governance processes, infrastructure and teacher training, while the 240-point learning outcomes domain (the ultimate goal) remained unchanged because the index retained PARAKH Rashtriya Sarvekshan 2024 scores for 2025-26.
The Performance Grading Index 2.0 evaluates States and UTs by placing them in grade bands rather than assigning ranks. It is built on 70 indicators across two categories — outcomes and governance, and management — and six domains: learning outcomes and quality, access, infrastructure and facilities, equity, governance processes, and teacher education and training.
The 2025-26 edition marks a clear shift. Chandigarh became the first State/ UT in the PGI 2.0 series to enter the Uttam range, scoring 766 out of 1,000 in 2025-26 and placing in Uttam-3, the lowest of the three Uttam bands. No State/UT reached Uttam-2, Uttam-1 or Utkarsh. Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu, Punjab, Kerala and Delhi were in Prachesta-1, followed by five in Prachesta-2, 13 in Prachesta-3 and 13 in Akanshi-1. For the first time in the latest three-year comparison, none was in the lowest bands (Akanshi-2 or Akanshi-3). The PGI 2.0 band hierarchy, from highest to lowest, is Utkarsh, followed by Uttam (1-3), Prachesta (1-3), and Akanshi (1-3), one being the top.
The climb is also visible at the bottom. Meghalaya, the lowest performer, moved from 448 in 2024-25 to 525.7 in 2025-26, exiting Akanshi-3. The gap between the highest and lowest scores narrowed to 240.3 points, or 31.4%, from 51% in 2017-18. The report notes that Meghalaya scored 53%, while all other States/ UTs were above 50%.
A TOI analysis of the State-wise annexures shows 32 of 36 States/ UTs improved over 2024-25. The average gain was 26.4 points, led by governance processes, which contributed 13.6 points on average, followed by infrastructure and facilities at 6.3 points and teacher education and training at 4.7 points. Learning outcomes showed no movement.
Governance was the main engine. Meghalaya gained 45.1 points in this domain, Lakshadweep 36.6, Bihar 34.9, Karnataka 33.2, Tamil Nadu 32.5, Goa 32.1 and Andhra Pradesh 32.0. Chandigarh’s own 26.9-point overall rise rested heavily on governance, where it moved from 83.2 to 106, becoming the only State/UT in Uttam-1 in the domain.
The same domain explains the reversals. Manipur, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha and Uttarakhand were the only four to decline overall, with each losing ground mainly on governance. Puducherry improved overall but slipped to 39.2 in governance, the only Akanshi-1 score in that domain.
The Performance Grading Index 2.0 evaluates States and UTs by placing them in grade bands rather than assigning ranks. It is built on 70 indicators across two categories — outcomes and governance, and management — and six domains: learning outcomes and quality, access, infrastructure and facilities, equity, governance processes, and teacher education and training.
The 2025-26 edition marks a clear shift. Chandigarh became the first State/ UT in the PGI 2.0 series to enter the Uttam range, scoring 766 out of 1,000 in 2025-26 and placing in Uttam-3, the lowest of the three Uttam bands. No State/UT reached Uttam-2, Uttam-1 or Utkarsh. Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu, Punjab, Kerala and Delhi were in Prachesta-1, followed by five in Prachesta-2, 13 in Prachesta-3 and 13 in Akanshi-1. For the first time in the latest three-year comparison, none was in the lowest bands (Akanshi-2 or Akanshi-3). The PGI 2.0 band hierarchy, from highest to lowest, is Utkarsh, followed by Uttam (1-3), Prachesta (1-3), and Akanshi (1-3), one being the top.
The climb is also visible at the bottom. Meghalaya, the lowest performer, moved from 448 in 2024-25 to 525.7 in 2025-26, exiting Akanshi-3. The gap between the highest and lowest scores narrowed to 240.3 points, or 31.4%, from 51% in 2017-18. The report notes that Meghalaya scored 53%, while all other States/ UTs were above 50%.
A TOI analysis of the State-wise annexures shows 32 of 36 States/ UTs improved over 2024-25. The average gain was 26.4 points, led by governance processes, which contributed 13.6 points on average, followed by infrastructure and facilities at 6.3 points and teacher education and training at 4.7 points. Learning outcomes showed no movement.
Governance was the main engine. Meghalaya gained 45.1 points in this domain, Lakshadweep 36.6, Bihar 34.9, Karnataka 33.2, Tamil Nadu 32.5, Goa 32.1 and Andhra Pradesh 32.0. Chandigarh’s own 26.9-point overall rise rested heavily on governance, where it moved from 83.2 to 106, becoming the only State/UT in Uttam-1 in the domain.
The same domain explains the reversals. Manipur, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha and Uttarakhand were the only four to decline overall, with each losing ground mainly on governance. Puducherry improved overall but slipped to 39.2 in governance, the only Akanshi-1 score in that domain.
Next Story